Friday, January 19, 2007

ScienceDaily: Survey Shows Strong Support For Offshore Wind Power

ScienceDaily: Survey Shows Strong Support For Offshore Wind Power


Survey Shows Strong Support For Offshore Wind Power

Science Daily Delawareans are strongly in favor of offshore wind power as a future source of energy for the state, according to a survey conducted by University of Delaware researchers.


This is the Nysted wind farm in the Baltic Sea off Denmark, photographed from a boat in November 2006. (Photo by Jeremy Firestone)
 
When asked to select from a variety of sources to help the state increase its energy supply, more than 90 percent of the 949 Delaware residents responding to the survey supported an offshore wind option--in which whirling wind turbines as tall as 40-story buildings would be erected off the coast to generate electricity--even if wind power were to add between $1 and $30 per month to their electric bills. Fewer than 10 percent voted for an expansion of coal or natural gas power at current prices.

The results are highlighted in an interim report released today by the study's authors, Jeremy Firestone and Willett Kempton, who are both marine policy scientists on the faculty of UD's College of Marine and Earth Studies, and doctoral student Andrew Krueger.

Their research was supported by a Green Energy Fund grant from the Delaware Energy Office in the Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control and by the college.

The policy scientists began the project last February, developed and pilot-tested the survey questions in the spring and summer, and then mailed the 16-page booklet-sized questionnaire to 2,000 Delaware residents in September, with remailings to individuals who had not yet returned their surveys in late October. Of the 1,839 valid mailings to Delaware addresses, 949 were completed and analyzed, for a response rate of better than 50 percent.

Delawareans 'amazingly supportive'

"Based on our results, Delaware could become the Denmark of the United States when it comes to relying on offshore wind power as a major energy source," Firestone said. "Delawareans are amazingly supportive of it."

And that came as a surprise to the policy scientists.

In 2004 and 2005, Kempton and Firestone had conducted two surveys of residents of Cape Cod about the controversial Cape Wind project, in which Energy Management Inc., a Massachusetts-based company, proposes to establish a wind farm of 130 423-foot-tall wind turbines in Nantucket Sound. They first interviewed 24 Cape Cod residents face-to-face, then did a larger survey of 500 people.

"The Cape Wind project has been under considerable public debate," Firestone said. "We found that a plurality of Cape Cod residents was opposed to that project."

However, the researchers found that nearly 78 percent of Delawareans statewide would give a project identical to Cape Wind a thumbs-up if it were located in Delaware, and only 4 percent would oppose such a project, with the remainder unsure.

To compare the Cape Cod and Delaware studies, the researchers included matching questions about the Cape Wind project in the Delaware survey and included photo simulations of how a wind farm at sea would appear at various distances, including from six miles from shore, the approximate distance from Hyannis, Mass., to the proposed Cape Wind project.

"Even in the ocean area, where respondents live, on average, about a half-mile from the coast, support for wind power outnumbers opposition by more than 3 to 1 in Delaware," Firestone noted.

"Interestingly, Delaware respondents who can see the ocean from their home were more supportive of a wind farm, at 59 percent, than all residents of either Cape Cod, at 25 percent, or New Jersey, at 41 percent," he added, noting that the New Jersey statistic is from a recent poll by non-UD researchers.

What accounts for Delawareans' positive opinions about offshore wind power?

It could be due to a range of factors, the scientists say, from "a well-financed opposition" to the Cape Wind project on Cape Cod, to increasing public awareness and concern about changing climate and "global warming," to health impacts and the recent electricity rate hikes in Delaware.

"The short answer is we just don't know yet why Delawareans are so much more supportive," Kempton said. "That's something we're hoping to determine in the more detailed statistical analysis we'll be doing next."

Potential effects on beach visitation

The Delaware survey also included questions to determine any potential effects on beach visitation by in-state residents if a large, 500-turbine wind farm were installed 6 miles off the state's coast.

"Our questions first placed the wind farm off the beach that an individual last visited and asked whether it would cause the individual to switch to another beach," Kempton said.

While 88.6 percent would continue to go to the same beach they last went to in Delaware even if a large wind farm were constructed offshore there, 5.6 percent said they would "switch" to another beach in Delaware, another 3.5 percent said they would go to a beach outside Delaware and 2.4 percent said they would visit no beach at all.

"A 5-6 percent loss of tourism could be a serious impact," Kempton said. "However, we also asked if people would be inclined to visit a Delaware beach that they did not typically visit, at least once, where a wind farm was visible offshore. The high response, at 84 percent, suggests that the wind turbines would actually draw visitors instead of drive them away."

This summer, the scientists and their graduate students will survey out-of-state visitors to Delaware's beaches to further explore how an offshore wind farm would affect tourism. That project is funded by the Delaware Sea Grant College Program--a partnership of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the state of Delaware and the University that conducts marine research, education and outreach projects throughout the state.

The scientists said one of the reasons they sought to conduct a survey of offshore wind power in Delaware is because there has not been a lot of public debate about the topic here.

"We wanted to study a place along the East Coast where there hadn't been much debate about offshore wind power and compare the results to places like Cape Cod," Firestone noted.

As the UD survey was being administered and analyzed this past fall, Bluewater Wind, a company from Hoboken, N.J., announced that it planned to submit a proposal to Delmarva Power & Light, in response to the utility's solicitation for bids to line up new long-term energy supplies for the state.

State encourages nonpolluting energy development

The Delaware state legislature had mandated that Delmarva Power & Light solicit the energy bids before the end of 2006 and included preferences for nonpolluting sources of electricity.

"I think interest in wind power and other renewable energy sources is now growing not only in Delaware, but nationally due to the rising cost and long-term supply issues associated with traditional energy sources, as well as other concerns such as global warming," Kempton said.

Kempton and Firestone are part of a research group at the UD College of Marine and Earth Studies that is exploring the science, resource and policy implications of offshore wind power. The group offers a graduate course on offshore wind power, including science, engineering and policy.

Kempton said UD students are interested in the topic, and he has seen increased enrollment across campus in the course.

"We now have a number of graduate students working in this area," he said.

The interim report on the survey and a one-page executive summary are available at the Web site of UD's Offshore Wind Power Group [ http://www.ocean.udel.edu/windpower/].

Hawking: Climate Change Worse Than Terror

 
 
LONDON - Scientist Stephen Hawking described climate change Wednesday as a greater threat to the planet than terrorism.
Hawking made the remarks as other prominent scientists prepared to push the giant hand of its Doomsday Clock - a symbol of the risk of atomic cataclysm - closer to midnight. The move will mark the fourth time since the end of the Cold War that the clock has ticked forward and Hawking warned that "as citizens of the world, we have a duty to alert the public to the unnecessary risks that we live with every day."
 

UK climate change costings 'too high'

FT.com / Business Life / Science & environment - UK climate change costings 'too high'

UK climate change costings 'too high'

By David Ibison in Stockholm

Published: January 18 2007 02:00 | Last updated: January 18 2007 02:00

The cost of combating climate change could be 40 per cent lower than the figure given in last year's watershed Stern report on the economic impact of global warming, according to research to be announced today.

The research will be presented by Lars Josefsson, chief executive of Vattenfall, the Swedish power company, and is likely to attract particular attention as he is a special adviser on the environment to Angela Merkel, Germany's chancellor.

Germany took on the presidency of the European Union on January 1 and Ms Merkel has made combating climate change a centrepiece of its rule. Sigmar Gabriel, Germany's environment minister, will attend the talk by Mr Josefsson.

"The cost of limiting the concentration of greenhouse gases is equivalent to 0.6 per cent of the total gross world product - if all the identified potential is exploited," Mr Josefsson told the FT.

Sir Nicholas Stern, a UK economist, propelled climate change up the political agenda in a report that claimed global warming could shrink the world economy by 20 per cent if nothing was done, but that action today would cost 1 per cent of GDP.

Mr Josefsson's report says lower costs can be achieved using measures that "pay for themselves", such as insulation improvements and fuel efficient cars. But it also envisages more use of nuclear power and carbon capture technology.

The research, which was paid for by Vattenfall, forms part of a drive by Mr Josefsson to enhance the role played by the world's leading companies to combat climate change. He oversaw last week's announcement of the creation of the 3C initiative, in which 15 of the world's largest companies joined forces to devise "commercial solutions and market-based investments" to climate issues.

US companies such as General Electric, NRG Energy and Duke Energy signed up to the 3C initiative, a development Mr Josefsson said meant the interests of US business and climate protection were becoming increasingly aligned.

He hopes the revelation that tackling global warming could be much cheaper than first thought, and led by large businesses, will galvanise political leaders into addressing climate-related issues.

Mr Josefsson plans to present the research to business leaders in Davos this month and will travel to Asia to convince business leaders there to join the 3C programme.

Saturday, January 13, 2007

Is Exxon Mobil Finally Engaging On Climate Change?

Is Exxon Mobil Finally Engaging On Climate Change? | Bozeman | New West Network

A SEA CHANGE FOR WORLD'S LARGEST OIL COMPANY?

Is Exxon Mobil Finally Engaging On Climate Change?


By Todd Wilkinson, 1-12-07

Is a titanic shift taking place at Exxon Mobil?

Like a major piece of glacial ice cracking away from a larger continental ice sheet and calving into the sea, only to melt away, the largest oil producer in the world appears to be on the verge of seriously engaging greenhouse gas as a policy question rather than funneling millions of dollars to faux-think tanks created to deny the existence of global warming.

Or so suggests a rapidly developing story titled Exxon Cutting Ties To Global Warming Skeptics from Reuters reporter Timothy Gardner. The implication is that Exxon Mobil Corp. may be starting to distance itself from the shrinking group of climate change denialists. The company has come under a firestorm of public scrutiny for its apparent two-sided approach to the science of climate change: On the one hand, corporate executives have vowed that they want to be part of constructive dialogue on how to approach CO2 emissions related to the burning of fossil fuels; meanwhile, the company has also channeled large sums of money behind the scenes to front groups operating with the express purpose of confusing and blunting the release of emerging science in order to delay action.

Later this winter, a report is expected to arrive from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) that will be the most forceful declaration to date on the causes and potential consequences of a warming planet. The past year, 2006, according to NOAA conclusions reported this week, was the warmest on human record.

Gardner wrote in his report Friday for Reuters: "Mark Boudreaux, a spokesman for Exxon, the world's biggest publicly traded company, said its position on climate change has been 'widely misunderstood and as a result of that, we have been clarifying and talking more about what our position is."

The story noted that Exxon Mobil has been participating in discussions with the non-profit group Resources for the Future, WorldWatch Institute, and the Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility about how to become constructively engaged in talks, some of which will soon be spearheaded by the new Congress.

Another organization that has been playing a leading role in fostering discussions with industry is the Energy Future Coalition involving former Colorado Sen. Timothy Wirth, president of the UN Foundation created through a $1 billion donation from philanthropist Ted Turner; Mike Finley, former superintendent of Yellowstone National Park and president of the Turner Foundation; and through John Podesta, president and CEO of the Center for Center for American Progress. Mr. Podesta previously served as chief of staff for President Bill Clinton. The Energy Future Coalition is lead by Reid Detchon and its advisory council includes well-known representatives from the business world as well as economists, academics and former elected leaders from both political parties.

Does this latest news signal a major change in direction for Exxon and one that may sway the White House to begin a real public dialogue on climate change perhaps resulting in a summit? The true test of Exxon's sincerity, observers say, is waiting to see if the company actually pulls the plug on funding to groups that have attempted to descredit the work of the leading climate scientists in the world.

Bizarre Form of Life Found in Arctic Ocean!

Bizarre Form of Life Found in Arctic Ocean! » Back To Wild


Bizarre Form of Life Found in Arctic Ocean!

A team of European researchers had found new organisms when they analyzed the DNA sequences that were present in samples of sea water.The Genetic evidence is suggesting the presence of an unknown kind of microalgae, which the researchers called as picobiliphytes ("pico" means "a trillionth of a part of") because of their very minute size.

"These organisms represent a new evolutionary lineage," said team member Fabrice Not. Not is a marine biologist at the Institut de Ciències del Mar, a part of Spain's National Research Council.
"The discovery didn't provide any sister relationship to any other groups of organisms known to date. It means that this new group is probably a high-rank taxon [group] in terms of classification,". "In fact, the divergence of this group from known organisms is as great as the difference between land plants and animals," Connie Lovejoy, a biologist at Universit Laval in Canada and another member of the research team, said in a statement.

The Story Beyond

Over an year the research team had tried techniques to see and count the tiny picobiliphytes, the scientists have not been able to grow microalgae in the lab. The scientists confirmed that picobiliphytes contain pigments called phycobilins that give out an orange fluorescent radiance when placed under blue light.

Another organism must have lived inside the picobiliphytes and provided them with an energy supply in the form of the light-absorbing pigments, that are not mentioned.In this case, judging from the type of pigments involved, the picobiliphytes probably got their pigments from a reddish microalgae, he added.

Biodiversity

Actually this discovery is a great boom for biodiversity. This is primarily pure fundamental research with no commercial application. The main fields this research impacts is the discovery of the microbial ecology and the evolution of eukaryotes' that contain the cells that also have a nucleus.

Robert Andersen, director of the Provasoli-Guillard National Center for Culture of Marine Phytoplankton in Maine, says the discovery is "terrific" and could have "considerable value" commercially. Andersen said other phycobilin-producing algae are commercially grown for their pigments, which are used in products such as cosmetics.

"Phycobilipigments are also rich sources of protein, and they are used as a food source in aquaculture hatcheries," he said. If the new picobiliphytes can be grown in sufficient quantities to provide such a nutrient source, he added, "they will really be valuable."

Bad news bears, Al Gore show reality of climate change

Timberjay Newspapers Online


Bad news bears, Al Gore show reality of climate change
By Nancy Jo Tubbs

There's bad news, good news and bad news about polar bears. The bad news is that recent research documents a 22 percent decrease in their population in Hudson Bay, Canada, where the loss of sea ice due to global warming is profound.

The good news is that Interior Secretary Dirk Kempthorne has proposed putting the polar bear on the endangered species list.

If in a year the bears are officially protected, if this act indicates a change in the Bush administration's denial of the existence of global warming, and if new environmental policies are put in place, we may still be too late to save the bears. Bad news.

Americans' profound ambivalence about the reality and consequences of global warming was illustrated in fascinating detail recently when a bunch of Ely folks got together to watch "An Inconvenient Truth," former Vice President Al Gore's movie about the effects of greenhouse gases and other causes of global warming. Gore sets forth the riveting detail of worldwide problems caused by climate change and suggests practical solutions. He believes that we are not necessarily facing a disastrous fate on planet Earth, but we need to get serious about making changes now.

The get together was a December house party, one of 2,000 organized by the political action group MoveOn.org, involving more than 10,000 people around the U.S. one December night. Laura and Joey Kenig and daughter Zane hosted the event in Ely, and a dozen or so friends came to potluck and watch Gore's blockbuster documentary. Through a computer hook up we saw dots on a map representing the other house parties across the U.S. and viewed the questions that each group sent out to Gore. Via conference call he talked with participants in real time. No, he doesn't plan to run for president again. He's got his mission, which is to show us the reality of global warming and bring us to the point where we're willing to face this environmental crisis and take action.

Gore effectively challenges the misconceptions that have kept us from dealing with the issue. For example, those who deny the existence of global warming profess a variety of alternate scenarios: the cities are just heating up with no effect on the overall warming of the planet. Or maybe, we're experiencing a temporary climate change because of a meteor that crashed in Siberia in the early 20th century.

Back to reality: Gore tells of a study published in the authoritative Science magazine that analyzed 928 randomly selected peer-reviewed science journal articles on global warming over the last 10 years. The percentage of those articles that expressed doubt about the cause of global warming: 0 percent.

Another significant study analyzed all of the articles on global warming over the past 14 years in four major US newspapers. Of the 636 articles in the popular press, the percentage of those in doubt about the cause of global warming: 53 percent. The disconnect between science and the popular press is extraordinary.

As Mark Twain said, "Denial ain't just a river in Egypt."

Thank goodness for the individuals, communities and corporations that are awakening to the immediacy of the problem and taking action. In 2005 Minnesotan Lonnie Dupre undertook the first summer crossing of the Arctic Ocean, while collecting scientific data and reporting back on global climate change.

Lee Frelich, founder and director of the University of Minnesota Center for Hardwood Ecology, has spoken in Ely and around the state on the effects of global warming, earthworm invasion and fire on the northern forests. Over the next 100 years, he predicts northeastern Minnesota could become warmer and either wetter or dryer than it is now. Will the BWCAW trade in the cold-loving black spruce for an oak savannah?

A year ago Will Steger, Ely's own Arctic explorer, created a foundation and the Global Warming 101 initiative through which he educates, empowers and informs the public and influences state and federal policy on climate issues.

The folks at the Ely house party are donating copies of the book and video of "An Inconvenient Truth" to libraries in downtown Ely, the high school and at Vermilion Community College.

I'd encourage you to check out the book or video. The good news is that we can work to begin turning around the disastrous climate changes that otherwise await us and the generations to follow. The bad news is that they're already upon us—as evident as the warming ocean and a polar bear that likely won't survive the 40-mile swim to the next ice floe.